Compare
Most AI writes patents. ClaimMark-P shows its work.
Plenty of tools can produce patent-shaped text. The question for a practitioner is whether you can check it: where each claim came from, what changed, and what still needs your judgment.
By type of tool
A general guide to the categories practitioners evaluate. Individual products differ; ask any vendor, including us, to show you on your own matter.
| ClaimMark-P | AI drafting assistants | General-purpose AI chat | Proofreading & rule checkers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drafts a complete application Claims, specification, abstract and figures | Claims, all filing sections, figures, DOCX | Varies by product | Text on request; you assemble it | Checks a draft you wrote |
| Office Action responses | Imports from the USPTO, parses every ground, maps cited passages | Varies by product | Copy and paste the action yourself | Not their job |
| Every sentence traced to its source Disclosure page, inventor answer, or cited reference | Every claim element, paragraph and argument | Citations vary by product | No | Not applicable |
| Knows what is stale after a change | Flags sections, figures and reviews that fell behind | Varies | No | No |
| Structured inventor intake | Guided invention record, gaps surfaced before drafting | Varies | No | No |
| Prior-art context | Search with source status and relevance reasoning | Some products | Can invent references | No |
| §112 and antecedent-basis checks | Surfaced as decisions for the attorney | Some products | No | Rule-based, mature |
| Client data kept out of model training | Never used; zero-data-retention providers | Enterprise terms vary | Depends on plan and settings | Usually runs locally |
Named products, side by side
Pick a group to compare ClaimMark-P with three similar products. Every cell comes from the vendor's own public website, checked on the date shown, and links to the page it came from. Where a vendor doesn't say, we say "not stated publicly" rather than guess. Hover a cell for the vendor's own words. See something out of date? Tell us and we'll correct it.
Venture-funded web platforms that cover drafting, prosecution and search.
| Capability | ClaimMark-P claimmark.ai | Solve Intelligence Checked 2026-09-26 | Patlytics Checked 2026-09-26 | Ankar Checked 2026-09-26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application drafting | web platform with Word-compatible output (no Word add-in found)source ↗ | web platformsource ↗ | full applications and invention disclosures, drafted in Ankar's own web editor (Word-compatible .docx round trip)source ↗ | |
| Office Actions | OA analysis and response drafting (arguments, amendments)source ↗ | OA analysis and response strategy (arguments, amendments)source ↗ | OA response drafting with prosecution-history ingestion and multiple strategy optionssource ↗ | |
| Prior-art search | agentic patent and NPL searchsource ↗ | patent and NPL prior-art searchsource ↗ | novelty and prior-art analysis claimed over 150M+ patent applications and 250M+ scientific publicationssource ↗ | |
| Figures | AI figure generation and editing, CAD inputsource ↗ | Not stated publiclysource ↗ | claims figure and flowchart generationsource ↗ | |
| Source tracing | claims citations: 'multi-source citations' and preserved citations in searchsource ↗ | claims citation-backed outputs with source auditing and confidence colorssource ↗ | explicit and central: 'Traceable Citations' is a named productsource ↗ | |
| Published accuracy benchmark | none publishedsource ↗ | none publishedsource ↗ | None publishedsource ↗ | |
| Security attestations | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001source ↗ | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001source ↗ | SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022source ↗ | |
| Public pricing | contact sales (custom pricing)source ↗ | contact sales / demo-ledsource ↗ | Not stated publiclysource ↗ |
Sources were checked on or before 2026-09-26. "Source tracing" means the vendor says outputs link back to or cite their source text; "Security attestations" shows a full badge for a stated SOC 2 Type II report. ClaimMark-P's row describes our own product and links to its pages. Product names are trademarks of their owners; ClaimMark is not affiliated with any of them. Vendors change quickly, so confirm anything important with the vendor directly.
Where others are ahead today
Evidence over slogans applies to us too.
Security attestations
Solve Intelligence, DeepIP, Patlytics and Ankar state SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001; Patent Bots, Tradespace and PowerPatent state SOC 2 Type II. ClaimMark-P is in SOC 2 readiness, and we will say so plainly until an independent report is issued. Our security package is available on request.
Inside Microsoft Word
DeepIP, ClaimMaster and Patent Bots run as Word add-ins, and PowerPatent offers a Word plugin for Office Actions. ClaimMark-P is a web workspace that exports an editable DOCX, so the final edit still happens in Word.
Lower prices per filing
ABIGAIL charges $250 per application and $99 per Office Action response export, and ClaimMaster, Patent Bots and PatentPal publish low monthly prices. ClaimMark-P charges $500 per application and $200 per response, or a monthly package, and is priced for practices that want claims hardened before filing, not only drafted.
Breadth of technology
ClaimMark-P launches for software, AI, cloud, cybersecurity and data-processing inventions. Chemical, biotech and mechanical matters come later, after they have been validated.
Bring your own matter.
Pick a published application or Office Action from your own practice. We will run it in ClaimMark-P during the demo, so you can compare the output with your own work, line by line.